Stump and N. Groblicki, De scientia Dei futurorum contingentium secundum S. Thomam eiusque primos sequaces , Krakow , pp. De ver. For the same objection and essentially the same reply see In I Sent. For the same reply see In I Sent.
For these see De veritate , p. Compare with the inadequate solutions discussed in In I Sent , d. Note that this particular point is brought out much more fully here than in the parallel discussion in In I Sent. However, it is clearly implied by Boethius in an earlier part of Bk V of his Consolation. See pr. In other contexts, such as De veritate , qu. See ed. Also see SCG I, ch. McSorley concedes that this precise terminology is not that of Aquinas. See A. A Collection of Critical Essays , A. Kenny, ed.
Without pausing here to discuss this point at length, it seems to me that Aquinas would assign to a past event the same kind of necessity that he assigns to a present event, that is, conditioned necessity necessitas consequentiae or necessity ex suppositione. Since any event that is temporally past in itself is eternally present to God, it enjoys the same kind of necessity as any present event that is perceived by us. Under the supposition that it is happening or has happened , it is happening or has happened.
This does not imply that it is absolutely or ontologically necessary in itself. A number of these parallels have already been pointed out in preceding notes. A first approach would reject this possibility because of the relationship that obtains between a cause and its effect. A second approach would be based on the relationship between science and its object.
Because science is certain knowledge, it seems to require certitude and determination in that which is known. It is in addressing himself to the second kind of objection, which he here regards as the more difficult, that Thomas proposes the solution we have already examined from the De veritate. See In I Sent. Also see M.
In ch. Divine eternity is present to all parts or instants of time, even as the center of a circle, being outside its circumference, bears an equal relationship to all points on that circumference. As regards things which are not yet but will be, God knows them by his scientia visionis not only in knowing his own power and in knowing their proper causes, but also in knowing them in themselves.
Once more he applies the distinction between necessitas consequentiae and necessitas consequentis or between conditional and absolute necessity. In this well known discussion Thomas notes that something contingent can be considered in itself as it now exists in actuality, or only as it exists in its cause and hence as future.
Considered in the first way it can be an object of certain knowledge, even on the level of sense perception. Considered in the second way, it is not yet determined ad unum , and hence cannot be known with certainty by any knower.
The Importance and Advantage of a Through Knowledge of Divine Truth | Monergism
See in particular objection 2 and the reply which is essentially the same as his reply to objection 7 in the De veritate , qu. Also cf. ST I, qu. On the date of this question in the De malo see J. In replying Thomas again distinguishes between knowing future things in themselves, and in their causes.
Only God can know future things in themselves, something that is impossible for knowledge that is subject to the order of time. God knows all things as present to him, since his knowledge is above the temporal order. Also see the reply to obj.
Way to Divine Knowledge
See ch. For this see S. Thomae Aquinatis Opuscula Theologica , Vol. Vernardo, ed. For a fuller discussion of most of the texts cited in the last few notes see J.
Groblicki, De scientia Dei fu turorum For a critical edition of the commentary by Ammonius see G. Verbeke ed. Vrin, Paris , pp.
See the Leonine edition, R. Spiazzi, ed. Often in citing it I shall simply list the paragraph numbers in my text or in the notes. For the present point see n. Nam in praeteritis et praesentibus necesse est quod altera oppositarum determinate sit vera et altera falsa in quacumque materia; sed in singularibus quae sunt de futuro hoc non est necesse, quod una determinate sit vera et altera falsa. See n. In this same context n.
Also see Ch. For much the samne, but much more briefly stated, see De malo , qu.
It was the only method of overcoming evil achieved by a new birth of a new sinless life in the soul and its reunion with God. The first dialogue took place in the morning. Humanus opened the dialogue. That no one needs to be told that ever since learning has borne rule in the Church, learned Doctors have contradicted and condemned one another in every essential point of the Christian doctrine.
Thousands of learned men tell the illiterate they are lost in this or that Church; and thousands of learned men tell them they are lost if they leave it. Theophilus was very pleased with the progress Humanus had made, especially with his resolution not to enter into debate about the Gospel doctrines with his [old Brethren] till they were ready for it and wanted to be saved and if that time should never come Humanus must consider them as disciples of Epicurus :. For every man that cleaves to this world, that is in love with it, and its earthly enjoyments, is a disciple of Epicurus, and sticks in the same mire of atheism as he did whether he be a modern Deist, a Popish or Protestant Christian, an Arian or an orthodox teacher.
For the whole matter lies solely in this, whether Heaven or Earth has the heart and government of man. For the truth of Christianity is the spirit of God, living and working in it, and where this spirit is not the life of it, there the outward form is but like the outward carcase of a departed soul. For the spiritual life The second dialogue took place in the afternoon of the same day. It opened with Academicus admitting rather peevishly that he was somewhat disappointed.
He had come expecting to hear everything he wanted to know about Jakob Boehme and his works, but so far Boehme had not even come up in the conversation. Academicus found Boehme totally unintelligible and so did all his friends, he added. Rusticus admonished Academicus by telling him about his neighbour John the Shepherd and his wife Betty:. Oh this impatient scholar! How much troubles do I escape through my want of his learning? How much better does my old neighbour John the Shepherd proceed? In winter evenings when he comes out of the field, his own eyes being bad, the old woman his wife puts on her spectacles and reads about an hour to him, sometimes out of the Scriptures, and sometimes out of Jacob Behmen for he has two or three of his books.
John, said [Rusticus], do you understand all this? Ah, says he, God bless the heart of the dear man, I sometimes understand but little of him; and mayhap Betty does not always read right; but that little which I often do understand, does me so much good, that I love him where I do not understand him. Rusticus added another little story of John the Shepherd. For John had rather the feeling of the gospel in his heart even if he did not understand it all than all those difficult explanations of the head of learned men. To this Theophilus answered:.
I am no more an enemy to learning than I am to that art which builds mills to grind our corn and houses for ourselves to dwell in. I esteem the liberal arts and sciences as the noblest of human things, I desire no man to dislike or renounce his skill in ancient or modern languages, his knowledge of medals, pictures, paintings, history, geography or chronology.
Recent Blog Posts
Popularity is calculated by comparing this book's number of editions to the book with the largest number of editions. Available formats. Kindle iBook ePUB. Read this book. William Law's career was one of many changes.
Free eBook: "The Way to Divine Knowledge," by William Law
He wore many hats: teacher, religious guide, dissenter, and mystic writer. This last shift from traditional, evangelical treatise and doctrine writer to student and scholar of mysticism is perhaps the most curious. After almost a decade of silence from his pen, Law published several volumes of Christian mystical study, one of which was Way to Divine Knowledge.